Book III, Chapter 46
CHAPTER 46.
Against the same opinion and hypothesis, by way of revelation in ‖D1 its own kind 1 concerning pure creatures, namely, Angels.
793C CAP. XLVI.
793D Contra eandem opinionem et hypothesin per viam reuelationis in ‖D1 proprio genere de puris creaturis, scilicet, Angelis.
With Christ as our guide, then, these objections have been set against the principal hypothesis along the first path of this two-way revelation in its own kind, the path concerning the Lord Jesus Christ. It seems to follow that we may proceed against that hypothesis also by the other method of the revelation, the one concerning pure creatures, namely Angels and men, his servants. Suppose, then, that a revelation is made in its own kind to Michael about his good future merits and about the salvation of Paul, who is still a pilgrim in this world.2 Notwithstanding this revelation, Paul can neither merit nor be saved. Hence Michael too can be deceived, and could previously have been deceived.3 For this reason he is not blessed even then, nor was he blessed before, as the things set out in the thirty-fourth of this book teach.4 Again, since, as the Philosopher says, "One absurdity granted, others follow,"5 it further follows evidently from this that Michael is not now certain of his future beatitude. Indeed, what seems more absurd, he is not certain of it as past or as present either,6
793D HIs ergo duce Christo secundum primam semitam huius biuialis reuelationis in proprio genere, de Domino scilicet Iesu Christo, contra hypothesin principalem oppositis, consequens videtur per alteram eius methodum, de puris scilicet creaturis, Angelis,
793E hominibus, seruis suis procedere contra eam. Fiat siquidem reuelatio in proprio genere Michaeli de bonis meritis futuris, et de saluatione Pauli adhuc in saeculo peregrini, qua non obstante potest Paulus nec mereri, nec saluari; quare et Michael decipi et prius fuisse deceptus; quamobrem et tunc non esse nec prius fuisse beatus, sicut docent praehabita tricesimo quarto huius. Rursum, quia sicut dicit Philosophus, Vno inconuenienti dato alia contingunt, ex isto vlterius sequitur euidenter Michaelem non esse nunc certum de beatitudine sua futura; imo quod videtur absurdius,
for this depends on one uncertain thing, since it is a future contingent. Hence he neither is blessed now nor ever was, as is clear from what was shown earlier in the thirty-fourth of this book. It also follows from the same premise that it lies in the power of Paul, a wretched pilgrim on earth, to drag Michael, a most happy citizen in heaven, down from his highest beatitude to the lowest misery, because by conjuring tricks he can shamefully deceive him all day long. Indeed, what is graver and worse, it follows that it is now possible, and depends on Paul's will, that Michael now sins and has sinned before. For suppose, according to the authorities on prayer and the manner of praying set out beforehand in the twenty-third and twenty-fifth of the first [book], that Michael has received a command in its own kind that he should wish to be saved everyone, and only the one, who is shown to him and seen as one to be saved, in its own kind and in the Word, and that he should assist with services and benefits only such a one. Suppose that Paul, still a pilgrim, is shown to him in its own kind and in the Word as one to be saved, and that Michael, by an act of willing in its own kind, wills him to be saved, and also renders him services and benefits. When all this has been done, it is still possible that Paul is not saved. Hence it is possible that Michael has sinned by willing him to be saved and by rendering him benefits against the divine command. For it is possible that he did not see Paul as one to be saved in its own kind and in the Word. Indeed, it is possible that he saw the opposite of this in the Word, and that he did not see this in its own kind, since what is false is in no way seen, just as it is not known. Suppose further, following on this, that Michael appears to Paul to comfort him and says, "May joy be with you always, for you are of the number of those to be saved." Yet it is still possible that Paul is, for the present, not to be saved but damned, and that Michael now sees this in the Word. It would then be possible that he asserts this against his mind and lies, that he is an Angel of Satan, an apostate from the truth, and that he has been so in the past. Moreover, it follows that Michael can believe two plainly contradictory things at once, against what was shown beforehand in the forty-second of this. For he now believes in its own kind that Paul is to be saved, and he must believe so for the present. Yet it is possible that he now sees the opposite of this in the Word, because it is possible that the opposite is now true and has been shown to him in the Word. Further, if it is possible that Paul is not saved, it is possible that Michael did not know with certainty in its own kind that Paul was to be saved. Hence it is possible that he did not will in its own kind that Paul be saved, and did not render him benefits, since this certain vision was the cause why he willed these things and did them, as has been argued more fully concerning vision in the Word in the thirty-third of this book and the chapters that follow. ‖C1 7 Likewise, according to this, any wretch can very easily inflict harm and punishment on the most holy and blessed Angels all day long without any preceding fault of theirs. This seems to rebound to their misery and to God's injury, as was shown more fully in the thirty-third of this book.
794A nec praeterita, nec praesenti: Haec enim dependet ex vno incerto, quia contingenter futuro; quare nec nunc est, nec vnquam fuit beatus, vt patet ex prius ostensis tricesimo quarto huius. Consequitur etiam ex eodem, quod sit in potestate Pauli miseri peregrini in terra detrahere Michalem faelicissimum ciuem in coelo a beatitudine sua summa ad imam miseriam, quia ipsum praestigiando decipere turpiter tota die: Imo quod grauius est et peius sequitur nunc esse possibile, et ex voluntate Pauli pendere Michaelem nunc peccare, et prius peccasse. Ponatur enim iuxta autoritates de orando et modo orandi praemissas vicesimo tertio et vicesimo quinto primi, Michaelem recepisse mandatum in proprio genere, quod omnem, et solum ostensum sibi et visum saluandum in proprio genere et in verbo velit saluari, iuuetque obsequijs et beneficijs
794B solum talem; ostendaturque sibi in proprio genere et in verbo Paulum adhuc peque regrinum saluandum, velitque volutione in proprio genere ipsum saluari, obsequia quoque ac beneficia ei praestet: quibus omnibus ita factis adhuc est possibile Paulum non saluari; quare et Michaelem peccasse volendo ipsum saluari, et beneficia sibi praestando contra mandatum diuinum; cum sit possibile ipsum non vidisse Paulum saluandum in proprio genere et in verbo, imo vidisse oppositum huius in verbo, et hoc in proprio genere non vidisse, cum falsum nullatenus videatur, sicut nec scitur. Ponatur etiam consequenter ad istud, quod Michael confortando Paulum appareat ei, et dicat, Gaudium tibi semper sit, quia tu es de numero saluandorum; adhuc autem est possibile Paulum pro nunc non esse saluandum, sed damnandum; et Michaelem hoc nunc videre in verbo, quare et contra mentem istud asserere et mentiri; esse quoque Angelum Satanae, a veritate Apostatam, ac in praeterito sic fuisse. Praeterea sequitur Michaelem posse credere duo
794C contradictoria plane simul, contra praeostensa quadragesimo secundo istius. Nunc enim credit in proprio genere Paulum esse saluandum, et necesse est eum credere pro nunc ita, et possibile est eum pro nunc videre oppositum eius in verbo, quia possibile est pro nunc oppositum esse verum, et ostensum sibi in verbo. Amplius autem si possibile sit Paulum non saluari, possibile est Michaelem non sciuisse certitudinaliter in proprio genere ipsum fuisse saluandum; quare nec voluisse in proprio genere ipsum esse saluandum, nec ei beneficia praestitisse, quia haec certa visio fuit causa quare voluit haec et fecit sicut et de visione in verbo tricesimo tertio huius et sequentibus capitulis plenius est ‖C1 argutum. Secundum istud similiter potest quilibet miser inferre facillime tota die sanctissimis et beatissimis Angelis nocumentum et poenam sine culpa aliqua praecedente, quod videtur in eorum miseriam et in Dei iniuriam redundare, sicut tricesimo tertio huius diffusius monstrabatur.
Notes
- 1
In proprio genere is rendered "in its own kind" throughout. It is Bradwardine's term for knowledge of a thing in its own proper manner, as distinct from knowledge "in the Word" (in verbo), that is, in God, the vision the blessed have. The two are contrasted throughout this chapter. The "two-way" (biuialis) revelation is revelation in its own kind, which can be approached by the path of Christ (ch. 45) or by that of pure creatures (this chapter). Savile's variant "primo" for "proprio" is not adopted, since the main reading construes.
↩ - 2
"Paul" and "Michael" are schematic names for a wayfarer (viator) and a blessed Angel. Paul is not here identified as the Apostle. He is simply a man still "in the world" (in saeculo peregrini), whose final salvation is a future contingent.
↩ - 3
The infinitives decipi … fuisse deceptus and, below, esse … fuisse depend on an elided verb. Since Paul "can" fail to be saved, the sense is carried by the possibility: Michael can be deceived and could have been deceived before. That possibility is enough for Bradwardine's inference that Michael is not blessed. I supply "can" and "could" accordingly.
↩ - 4
Chapter numbers in cross-references are ordinal ablatives with capitulo understood (tricesimo quarto huius, vicesimo tertio … primi). Following the conventions, they are left as Bradwardine wrote them. Here "of this" means "of this book" (the third), and "of the first" means "of the first book."
↩ - 5
A scholastic commonplace attributed to "the Philosopher" (Vno inconuenienti dato alia contingunt). Savile gives no marginal citation, and I have not identified a precise passage in Aristotle.
↩ - 6
The Latin is nec praeterita, nec praesenti, with "beatitude" understood from the preceding clause. The sense is that Michael is certain of his beatitude neither as past nor as present. The following Haec … dependet then takes his past and present beatitude as its subject.
↩ - 7
Savile's marginal variant "ostensum" for "argutum" ("shown" for "argued") would give the sense "as has been shown more fully." The main reading construes and is kept.
↩
Errata: where the keyed text and the 1618 print differ (2)
| Savile | Keyed text (TCP) | 1618 print |
|---|---|---|
| 794A | Michalem | Michaelem |
| 794B | peque regrinum | peregrinum |