Thomae Bradwardini · De causa DeiLib. I. Cap. III.

Book I, Chapter 3

SavileLatinEnglish
169A–169E
  • B1 Aristotle.
  • E1 Philosophus.

Chapter III. That God is the necessary efficient cause of every thing made. It has a Corollary with three parts.

To this it must be added that God is the necessary efficient cause of every thing made. For it seems less for a thing to exist through itself, or to preserve another, than to make something through itself when it was not. But no creature can do even the lesser in this matter, as the preceding chapter taught; therefore it cannot do the greater either. God, therefore, of necessity puts his hand to every making. The arguments made about preservation can also be made about making, with the terms interchanged; and many of the authorities that speak of preservation speak likewise of making. Besides the authorities cited above, there are also many others that bear witness to the truth. B1 Aristotle, in On the World 11,1 says: "An ancient saying, handed down from our fathers, is common to all men, that all things are from God and consist through God." And below: "God is in truth the savior and begetter of all things, whatever is made in whatever way in this world." And it follows, in another translation: "But he works through himself, sustaining the labor of a laboring animal,2 yet also using an impassible power." And below, in the same place, he shows that God makes all the works of this world by a single action, saying: "Just as in a chorus, when the chorus-leader begins, the whole chorus of men and women sings together in various voices, high and low, making one continuous harmony; so it is with God, who disposes all things." And he goes on: "What is done in time of war seems most nearly comparable. When the trumpet signals the army, then each man, hearing the blast, one takes up a shield, another greaves and a helmet, and fits on a belt; one bridles a horse, another mounts a chariot, another gives the signal; soon the leader of the ambush takes his stand in the ambush, the commander of the battle line in the line, the soldier on the wing, and the unarmed man runs back to his own affairs. All things are moved under one signaller, by the nod of the Leader who holds the power; so must we understand also of the universe. For from the one mover, all being stirred up, their own proper acts are done, and this by a being invisible and hidden, which is in no way a hindrance either to that being in acting, or to us in believing." But this single action of God is not the motion of the heavens, as some dream, but God's single speaking or saying, as Aristotle himself testifies in the same chapter, as is recounted in the preceding chapter.3 He shows the same thing next through another likeness: "For the soul, through which we live and have houses and cities, is a being seen to be invisible through its works. For the whole beauty of life has been discovered by it, and ordered, and held together: the tilling of the land, plantations, the devising of arts, the use of laws, adornment and civic order, domestic affairs, and wars or peace beyond the borders. These things must be considered, or understood according to another translation,4 of God: a being most strong, in appearance most beautiful, in life immortal, in power most mighty, or, according to another translation, best. Therefore, though invisible to all nature, he is seen from his very works. For all the occurrences, those through the air, those upon the earth and those in the water, will truly be called works of God, who pours them out over the world; from which, according to the natural philosopher Empedocles: 'All things whatever that are and later will be, trees came forth from them, and men with women, wild beasts and birds too, and the fishes nourished in the waters.'" Hence the Apostle to the Romans 1: "The invisible things of God, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood through the things that were made; also his eternal power and divinity." The holy Fathers understand it so, expounding it literally. In Wisdom 13, too, the argument against idolaters is made by this: "Vain," it says, "are all men in whom knowledge of God is not present, and who from the things that are seen to be good could not understand what is,5 nor by attending to the works did they recognize who the artificer was." And it goes on: "For from the greatness of beauty and of the creature the Creator can be seen intelligibly." And below in the same place: "But if they had been able to know so much as to be able to estimate the world, how did they not more readily find its master?"

169A CAP. III. Quod Deus est necessaria causa efficiens cuiuslibet reifactae: habet Corollarium habens tres partes.

169A HVic autem addendum, quod Deus est necessaria causa efficiens cuiuslibet rei factae: Minus enim videtur rem per se existere, vel aliam conseruare, quam per se facere aliquid cum non esset. Sed nulla creatura potestin hoc minus, sicut capitulum proximum docuit; quare nec in

169B hoc maius: Deus ergo necessario apponet manum ad quamlibet factionem. Rationes quoque factae de conseruatione possunt fieri de factione, terminis permutatis; et multae autoritatum de conseruatione loquentium, loquuntur de factione similiter. Sunt etiam praeter autoritates superius allegatas, multae quae perhibent testimonium veritati. B1 Aristoteles quidem in De mundo 11. Antiquus, inquit, sermo, et paternus est cunctis hominibus, quod a Deo omnia, et per Deum consistant. Et infra; Est, inquit, reuera saluator et genitor omnium Deus, quaecunque quocunque modo fiunt in hoc mundo; Et sequitur, in alia translatione; At vero per se operatur laboriosi animalis laborem sustinens, sed et potentia vtens impassibili. Et infra eodem ostendit, quod Deus vnica actione facit omnia opera huius mundi, sic dicens; Sicut autem in chorae a inchoante Choraula concinit tota chorae a virorum et mulierum, varijs vocibus acutis et gradibus, vnam harmoniam continuam continuantibus; sic se habet res et in Deo, qui cuncta disponit, et sequitur consequenter: videtur maxime comparari quod

169C agitur eis quae fiunt tempore belli, quando buccina significat exercitui; tunc enim vnusquis que audito clangore, hic quidem sumit clypeū, alius coxalia et cassidē, et baltheū adaptat; et hic quidem fraenat equum, ille ascendit bigas, alius praebet signum; mox autem dux insidiare consistit in insidijs, princeps autem aciei in acie, miles autem in cornu, inermis vero recurrit ad propria; omnia autem sub vno significatore mouentur nutu Ducis qui fungitur potestate; sic et de vniuerso sapiendum. Nam ab vno mouente omnibus excitatis fiunt propria, et hoc inuisibili ente et occulto, quod nequaquam est impedimento nec illi ad agendum, nec nobis ad credendum. Haec autem vnica Dei actio, non est motus coeli, sicut aliqui somniant, sed vnicum Dei loqui, seu dicere, ipsomet Aristotele eodem cap. attestante, sicut cap. proximo recitatur. Hoc idem consequenter per aliud simile sic ostendit; Nam anima per quam viuimus, et aedes, et vrbes habemus, inuisibile ens videtur per opera sua. Nam totus vitae decor ab

169D hac inuentus est, et ordinatus, et contentus; culturae terrae, plantationes, excogitatio artium, legum vsus, ornatus, et ciuilitas, intestina negotia, extra terminos praelia seu pax. Haec oportet et de Deo considerare seu intelligi secundum aliam translationem, ente fortissimo, specie vero speciocissimo, vita immortali, virtute potentissimo, seu optimo secundum aliam translationem. Quapropter inuisibilis factus omni naturae videtur ex ipsis operibus. Nam passiones omnes tam quae per aerem, quam quae super terram, et quae in aqua, dicentur vere opera Dei diffundentis super mundum; ex quo secundum naturalem Empedoclem; Omnia quaecunque sunt et postmodum erunt, processerunt arbores, et viri cum foeminis, ferae quoque et volucres; nec non pisces in aquis nutriti. Vnde Apostolus ad Rom. 1. Inuisibilia Dei a creatura mundi per ea quae facta sunt intellecta conspiciuntur; sempiterna quoque eius virtus et diuinitas; quod et sentiunt sancti Patres literaliter exponentes. Sapientiae quoque 13. per hoc contra idololatras disputatur; Vani, inquit, sunt omnes homines quibus non subest scientia

169E Dei, et de his quae videntur bona, non potuerunt intelligere quid est, neque operibus attendentes agnouerunt quis esset artifex. Et sequitur; A magnitudine enim speciei et creaturae cognoscibiliter poterit Creator videri. Et infra eodem; Si autem tantum potuissent scire, vt possent aestimare saeculum, quomodo huius dominum facilius non inuenerunt? Adhuc autem et Philosophus in De mundo 11. dicit de Deo; Cumque sit vnus, E1 multinomius est nominatus ab omnibus passionibus quas innouat ipse; vocamus autem eum Iouem, dicitur etiam fulmineus a fulmine, pluuialis a pluuia, tonitrualis, tempestuosus, serenus, et finita tali inductione, quasi per singula in fine subiungit; et in summa loquendo, Caelestis et terrestris appellandus a qualibet natura et fortuna, velut ens ipse omnium causa, propter quod non male dicitur in Orphicis, Iupiter Arigikeminus, secundum aliam translationem Princeps fulminum; et sequitur Iupiter Caput, Iupiter medius, a Ioue omnia generata

169E–170B
  • E1 The Philosopher.
  • A1 Isaiah.
  • ‖A2 (variant) 36; Daniel 3 (see note 8).
  • A3 Augustine.

Furthermore, the Philosopher too in On the World 11 says of God: "Though he is one, he is named with many names from all the effects that he himself renews; for we call him Jove, and he is also called Thunderer from the thunderbolt, Rain-giver from the rain, Thundering, Stormy, Serene," and, when such an enumeration is finished, as if by way of the particulars he adds at the end: "and, to speak in sum, to be called Heavenly and earthly from every nature and fortune, as being himself the cause of all things, on account of which it is not ill said in the Orphic [verses]: Jupiter Arigikeminus," in another translation "Prince of thunderbolts"; and it goes on:6 "Jupiter the Head, Jupiter the middle; from Jove all things have been generated." Hermes, Plato, Avicenna, Algazel, Averroes, the author of the Book on Causes and its Commentator,7 and a not small crowd of philosophers agree with this opinion. The whole sequence of both Testaments also very often attests this opinion. Hence Isaiah 45: "I am the Lord, doing all these things"; A1 and below in the same place he curses all who say the contrary: "Woe," he says, "to him who contradicts his maker, a potsherd of the potsherds of the earth." And earlier, ‖A2 chapter 26: "Lord, you will give us peace; for you have wrought all our works, Lord." Therefore in the hymn of the three boys,8 too, all creatures, as works of the Lord, are roused in order to bless the Lord, as if to render thanks to their Worker. And in John 5 the Truth itself says: "My Father works until now, A3 and I work"; whence also earlier, in John 1: "All things were made through him." On which Augustine, in the first homily:9 "Understand it, then, brothers, altogether thus: All things were made through him; the whole creation was made through him, the greater and the lesser. For there is no form, no structure, no concord of parts, no substance of any kind, that could have weight, number, measure, except through that Word and from that Creator to whom it was said: You have disposed all things in measure and number and weight. God made all things and set them in their own degrees. All things, then, brothers, all things altogether were made through him, and without him nothing was made."

169E (Latin of this passage: see the block above)

170A sunt. In istam quoque sententiam consentiunt Hermes, Plato, Auicenna, Algazel, Auerroes, Autor de causis Commentator ipsius, et turba Philosophorum non parua. Istam quoque sententiam vtriusque testamenti series saepissime contestatur. Vnde Esaiae 45. Ego Dominus faciens omnia haec; A1 Et infra eodem, omnes dicentes contrarium maledicit; Vae, inquit, qui contradicit factori suo, testa de samijs terrae; Et supra ‖A2 26. Domine dabis pacem nobis. Omnia enim opera nostra operatus es Domine. Quare et in hymno trium puerorum, Omnes creaturae tanquam opera Domini per ordinem excitantur ad benedicendum Domino, quasi operatori suo gratias relaturae; et Ioannis 5. veritas ipsa dicit, Pater meus vsque modo operatur, A3 et ego operor: vnde et supra; 1o. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Vbi Augustinus homilia prima, Omnino ergo Fratres sic accipite, Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, vniuersa creatura per ipsum facta est, maior et minor. Nulla enim forma, nulla compages, nulla concordia partium, nulla qualiscunque substantia est, quae posset habere pondus, numerum,

170B mensuram, nisi per illud verbum et ab illo creatore, cui dictum est, Omnia in mensura et numero et pondere disposuisti; Deus fecit omnia, et in suis gradibus collocauit. Omnia ergo per ipsum, Fratres, omnino omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil. Idem infra homilia octaua; Sicut, inquit, quod miserunt ministri in hydrias, in vinum conuersum est opere Domini; sic et quod nubes fundunt, in vinum conuertitur eiusdem opere Domini. Illud autem non mitamur, quia omni anno fit; assiduitas amisit admirationem. Quis est enim qui considerat opera Dei quibus regitur et administratur totus hic mundus, et non obstupescit? Obruitut miraculis: sed quia homines in aliud intenti perdiderunt considerationem operum Dei, in qua darent laudem quotidie creatori; seruauit sibi Deus inusitata quaedam, quae faceret, vt tanquam dormientes homines ad se colendum, mirabilibus excitaret. Mortuus resurrexit, Mirati sunt homines; tot quotidie nascuntur, et nemo miratur. Si tamen consideremus prudentius maioris miraculi est esse qui non erat, quam reuiuiscere qui erat. Et

The same author, below, in the eighth homily: "As," he says, "what the servants put into the water jars was turned into wine by the work of the Lord, so too what the clouds pour out is turned into wine by the work of the same Lord. But the latter we do not marvel at, because it happens every year; constant repetition has lost the wonder. For who is there that considers the works of God by which this whole world is ruled and administered, and is not struck dumb? He is overwhelmed with miracles. But because men, intent on other things, have lost the consideration of God's works, in which they would daily give praise to the Creator, God has kept for himself certain unusual things which he would do, in order to rouse men, sleeping as it were, to worship him by marvels. A dead man rose again: men marveled. So many are born daily, and no one marvels. Yet if we consider more prudently, it is a greater miracle that one who was not should be, than that one who was should come to life again." And in On the Trinity 3, almost throughout the whole book, he proves the same by very many examples. C1 Hence in chapter 5 he says that the divine power, which administers the whole spiritual and corporeal nature, makes rain on fixed days every year; but when it made rain at the prayers of Elijah, as if against the natural disposition of the air, it was called a miracle. So God works lightnings and thunders; but when on Mount Sinai they occurred in an unusual manner, they seemed miracles. Who draws moisture through the root of the vine to the cluster and makes wine, if not God, who gives the increase while man plants and waters? But when at the nod of the Lord Water was turned into Wine with unusual swiftness, the divine power was made manifest even to fools, who confessed it. Who solemnly clothes shrubs with leaf and flower, if not God? Yet when the rod of the priest Aaron flowered, Divinity in a manner conversed with a doubting man. And certainly for all woods, and for the generating and forming of the flesh of all animals, earthly matter is common; and who makes them, if not he who said, that the earth should bring these forth, and who in that same word of his, by which he created, rules and acts?

170B (Latin of this passage: see the block above)

170C 3. de Trinit. quasi per totum librum per exempla plurima probat idem. C1 Vnde cap. 5. dicit quod vis diuina, quae totam spiritualem corporalemque naturam administrat, omnium annorum certis diebus facit pluuiam; sed quando fecit pluuiam ad preces Eliae quasi contra dispositionem aeris naturalem, miraculum dicebatur. Ita Deus operatur fulgura et tonitrua; sed quando in monte Sina inusitato more fiebant, miracula videbantur. Quis attrahit humorem per radicem vitis ad botrum, et vinum facit nisi Deus, qui et homine plantante et rigante incrementum dat? Sed cum ad nutum Domini Aqua in Vinum inusitata celeritate conuersa est, etiam stultis fatentibus vis diuina declarata est. Quis Arbusta fronde et flore solenniter vestit nisi Deus? verum cum floruit virga Sacerdotis Aaron colloquuta est quodammodo cum homine dubitante Diuinitas; Et lignis certe omnibus, et omnium animalium carnibus gignendis atque formandis communis est terrena materies, et quis ea facit, nisi qui dixit; vt haec terra produceret, et in eodem verbo suo, quo creauit, regit, et agit. Ex his omnibus

170C–170E
  • C1 Augustinus
  • D1 The Apostle.
  • *E1 (variant, starred) in Averroes; (source) Job (see note 11).

From all these things it is clear enough that God, who does rare miracles, likewise does the other, customary works. Is not this also what the Apostle teaches in Romans 11, saying thus: D1 "From him and through him and in him are all things"? Is not this also one article of faith, as the Nicene creed attests, which teaches us to believe in God the Father, maker of all things visible and invisible, and in the Son through whom all things were made? Furthermore, God makes every man, and universally every Animal, wholly according to body and soul, and not natural agents alone; so by like reasoning he makes every thing made. For the Philosopher says in On Animals 11, in the old translation:10 "It must be said of the natures of Animals, whether it be the most noble or the ignoble, that the nature which created the animals will be the cause of great delight in those who can know the causes of nature, that is, the Philosophers of nature, when they consider it in a lowly animal. And on this account we ought to consider their forms, and delight in the Craftsman who made them, since the craft of the one who works is made manifest in the thing worked; for example, because in the making of images the knowledge of the craftsman appears. And on this account it is permitted that we look, or else that we not shun consideration, in the natures of lowly Animals; and let this not be burdensome to us as it is to children, for in all natural things there is something wonderful. And on this account we ought to inquire into the nature of every Animal, and to know that in all Animals there is a noble natural thing, since none of them was brought into nature idly or by chance; but however much there will be from the operations of nature, there will be none except for the sake of something; and everything that was or will be neither was nor will be except for the sake of something, and *E1 for completion,11 and on this account has a noble place and order." With this also agrees the saying of Averroes on Metaphysics 12, comment 19, set forth earlier in the second [chapter] of this [work].12

170C (Latin of this passage: see the block above)

170D satis patet, quod Deus qui facit rara miracula, facit similiter caetera opera consueta. Nonne et hoc est quod docet Apostolus ad Rom. 11. ita dicens, D1 Ex ipso et per ipsum et in ipso sunt omnia? Nonne et iste est vnus articulus fidei sicut symbolum Nicaenum testatur? docens credere in Deum Patrem factorem visibilium omnium, et inuisibilium, et in Filium per quem omnia facta sunt? Amplius autem, Deus facit omnem hominem, et vniuersaliter omne Animal totum secundum corpus et animam, et non agentia naturalia ipsa sola; quare et simili ratione, omnem rem factam. Dicit enim Philosophus 11. de Animalibus in antiqua translatione, Dicendum naturas Animalium siue sit nobilissimum siue ignobile, quoniam natura quae creauit animalia erit causa magnae dilectionis in illis, qui possunt cognoscere causas naturae, scilicet Philosophis naturae, quando considerant in animali vili; et propter hoc debemus considerate formas eorum, et delectari in Artifice qui fecit eas, quoniam artificium operantis manifestatur in operato; verbi gratia, quia in operatione imaginum apparet scientia

170E artificis, et propter hoc licet vt nos videamus, vel alias non vitemus considerationem in naturis Animalium vilium, et non sit hoc nobis graue sicut pueris, et in omnibus rebus naturalibus est mirabile; et propter hoc debemus inquirere naturam cuiuslibet Animalis, et scire quod in omnibus Animalibus est res naturalis nobilis, quoniam non fuit naturatum vllum eorum otiose ne que casualiter, sed quantumcun que erit ex operationibus naturae, non erit nisi propter aliquid; et omne quod fuit aut erit, non fuit neque erit nisi propter aliquid, et *E1 complementum, et propter hoc habet locum et ordinem nobilem. Huic et consonat dictum Auerrois super 12. Metaphys. comment. 19. secundo huius praemissum. Nonne et ideo Iob. 10. loquens Deo sic ait, Manus tuae plasmauerunt me, et fecerunt me totum in circuitu,

170E–171C
  • *E1 in Auerroes. Iob.
  • A1 The Prophet. Jeremiah.
  • B1 The Apostle. Augustine.
  • ‖C1 (variant) appetitiones.

Is it not also for this reason that Job 10, speaking to God, says thus: "Your hands fashioned me, and made me whole all round,"13 according to the punctuation of blessed Gregory, Moralia 9, 26? And below: "Did you not milk me like milk, and curdle me like cheese? Did you not clothe me with skin and flesh, and put me together with bones and sinews?" And the Prophet: "Your hands made me, and fashioned me," A1 Psalm 118 [119]. Whence also the Lord of the Prophets: "Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you," Jeremiah 1. Therefore Augustine too, expounding that verse of Psalm 118 just cited, says it can be understood in two ways. In one way, according to Adam: since all men have been propagated from him, which of men, once he was made, cannot say that he too was made, by reason of origin and of seed? In another way: because each one is born not without the work of God even from parents, God himself creating while they generate; since if the operative power of God is withdrawn from things, they perish, and nothing at all is born, whether of the elements of the world, or of parents, or of seeds, if God does not work in them. The same, on Genesis according to the letter 9, 23:14 "What service the Angels rendered to God in that formation of the woman, who would dare to affirm? Yet I would say most certainly that that supplement of flesh in the place of the rib, and the body and soul of the woman herself, the conformation of the members, all the viscera, all the senses, and whatever it was by which she was both a creature and a human being and a woman, was made by none other than that work of God which God worked not through Angels but through himself, and did not abandon; but these works are continued, so that neither the nature of those other things nor that of the Angels themselves would subsist, if he did not work." Furthermore, God makes all plants, and natural agents alone do not suffice; so also all other things, by like reasoning. Is not this what the Apostle says in 1 Corinthians 3: B1 "Neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the increase"? So also Augustine, on Genesis according to the letter 9, 22, says that Farmers are not the creators of crops or trees: "For neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the increase." And he says that the Farmer makes nothing grow, but He who disposes all things in measure and number and weight, who gives the increase. Nor does the Physician, by applying medicines, heal the sick; but nature does that, by an interior motion most hidden from us; and if God were to withdraw from it the inmost operation by which he establishes and makes it, it would at once, as if extinguished, leave nothing remaining. The same, On the Trinity 3, 7: "The Apostle," he says, "distinguishing God who creates and forms inwardly from the works of the creature that are applied from outside, and taking a likeness from Agriculture, says: I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the increase. As, therefore, in our very life, none but God can form the mind by justifying it, while men can preach the Gospel outwardly; so God works inwardly the creation of visible things, but the outward operations, whether of good or evil Angels or men, or even of any Animals whatever, according to his command, and the distributions of powers and the ‖C1 appetites15 for advantages apportioned by himself, he thus applies to the nature of things, in which he creates all things, as the farmer applies cultivation to the earth." The Truth itself also truthfully attests this same thing of the Lilies and the Grass, that God thus clothes them, as is recounted in Matthew 6 and Luke 12.

170E (Latin of this passage: see the block above)

171A secundum punctuationem beati Gregorij 9. moral. 26. Et infra, Nonne sicut lac mulsisti me, et sicut caseum me coagulasti; pelle et carnibus vestisti me, ossibus et neruis compegisti me? et Propheta, Manus tuae fecerunt me, et plasmauerunt me, A1 Psal. 118. vnde et Dominus Prophetarum, priusquam te formarem in vtero, noui te. Ier. 1. Quare et Augustinus exponens illud Psalmi 118. praemissum, dicit hoc posse dupliciter intelligi, vno modo secundum Adam, ex quo cum sint omnes homines propagati, quis hominum, quando iste factus est, etiam se factum non potest dicere, originis seminisque ratione? Alio modo, quia vnusquis que non sine opere Dei etiam de parentibus sit ipso creante, ipsis generantibus, quoniam si operatoria potentia Dei rebus subtrahatur, intereunt, nec aliquid omnino siue de mundi elementis, siue de genitoribus, siue de seminibus nascitur, si ea non operetur Deus. Idem 9. super Genesin ad literam 23. Quale, inquit, ministerium Deo exhibuerint Angeli in illa mulieris formatione, quis audeat affirmate? certissime tamen dixerim supplementum illud carnis in costae locum, ipsiusque

171B foeminae corpus et animam, conformationem que membrorum, omnia viscera, sensus omnes, et quicquid erat quo illa et creatura et homo et foemina erat, non nisi illo opere Dei factum, quod Deus non per Angelos, sed per semetipsum operatus est, et non dimisit, sed ista continuantur opera, vt nec illarum aliarum rerum, nec ipsorum Angelorum natura subsistat, si non operetur. Amplius autem Deus facit omnia vegetabilia, nec agentia naturalia sola sufficiunt, quare et alia vniuersa, simili ratione. Nonne hoc est quod dicit Apostolus 1. ad Cor. 3. B1 Neque qui plantat est aliquid, neque qui rigat, sed qui incrementum dat Deus? Quare et Augustinus 9. super Genesin ad literam 22. dicit, quod Agricolae non sunt creatores segetum, aut arborum; Non enim qui plantat aliquid est, neque qui rigat, sed qui incrementum dat Deus. Et dicit quod Agricola nihil facit crescere, sed ille qui omnia in mensura et numero, et pondere disponit, qui dat incrementum: Nec Medicus adhibens medicamina sanat aegros, sed natura illud agit interiore motu nobis occultissimo; cui tamen si Deus subtrahat operationem

171C intimam, qua eam substituit, et facit, continuo tanquam extincta nulla remanebit. Idem 3. de Trinit. 7. Apostolus, inquit, discernens interius Deum creantem atque formantem ab operibus creaturae quae admouentur extrinsecus, et de Agricultura similitudinem assumens, ait; Ego plantaui, Apollo rigauit, sed Deus incrementum dedit. Sicut ergo in ipsa vita nostra, mentem iustificando formare non potest nisi Deus, praedicare autem exterius Euangelium homines possunt: Ita creationem rerum visibilium Deus interius operatur, exteriores autem operationes, siue bonorum, siue malorum Angelorum vel hominum, siue etiam quorumcunque Animalium, secundum imperium suum, et a se partitas distributiones potestatum et ‖C1 appetitudines commoditatum; ita rerum naturae adhibet in qua creat omnia, quemadmodum terrae Agriculturam. Hoc idem et veritas ipsa veraciter contestatur de Lilijs et Foeno, quod Deus sic vestit; sicut Matth. 6. et Luc. 12. recitatur.

The first: that no thing can do anything without God. 1.

The second: that no thing can do anything unless God through himself and immediately does that same thing. 2.

The third: that no thing can do anything unless God does that same thing more immediately than any other agent. 3.

From which it follows manifestly that no thing can do anything without God; and that no thing can do anything unless God through himself and immediately does that same thing, indeed even more immediately than any other agent: immediately, I say, not only locally but also naturally and causally, and more immediately in the same ways, or at least naturally and causally. For it is less to preserve a thing made in being than to make it from non-being; but by the Corollary of the second, no thing can preserve another thing made in being without God likewise preserving it, and this immediately, indeed more immediately than any other preserver; therefore neither can any thing make a thing from non-being without God likewise making it, and this immediately, indeed more immediately than any other maker. Again, every thing, just as it can make something, so also can preserve in being what is made and preservable, because this is easier. But if the opposite of the aforesaid corollary is granted, some thing can make something without God, or without God making the same thing immediately or more immediately. Therefore some thing can thus preserve something, against the aforesaid second corollary. The arguments also and the authorities adduced for that corollary prove this corollary. But if anyone should presume to say that God is said to do all things not because he does them immediately, through himself and properly, but only by means of the Heaven, and because he made natural agents and patients, or preserves them, or because he permits, or does not prevent, or defends against impediments, he will easily be refuted by what has been said above, just as the preceding chapter refuted a similar presumption of his.

171D Prima, quod nulla res potest aliquid facere sine Deo. 1. Secunda, quod nulla res potest aliquid facere, nisi Deus per se et immediate faciat illudidem. 2. Tertia, quod nulla res potest aliquid facere, nisi Deus faciat illud idem immediatius quolibet alio faciente. 3.

171D VNde consequitur manifeste, quod nulla res potest aliquid facere sine Deo; et quod nulla res potest aliquid facere, nisi Deus per se et immediate faciat illud idem, imo et immediatius quolibet alio faciente, immediate, inquam, nedum localiter, sed et naturaliter atque causaliter, et immediatius eisdem modis, vel saltem naturaliter atque causaliter. Minus est enim rem factam seruare in esse, quam ipsam facere de non esse; sed per Corollarium secundi, Nulla res potest aliam rem factam seruare in esse sine Deo ipsam similiter conseruante, et hoc immediate, imo et immediatius quolibet alio conseruante; quare nec aliqua res potest rem facere

171E de non esse sine Deo ipsam similiter faciente, et hoc immediate, imo et immediatius quolibet alio faciente. Item omnis res sicut potest aliquid facere, sic potest et factum seruabile seruare in esse, quia hoc est facilius: sed si detur oppositum corollarij praelibati, aliqua res potest aliquid facere sine Deo, vel sine Deo idem immediate aut immediatius faciente. Potest ergo aliqua res sic aliquid conseruare contra coroll. 2i praedictum. Rationes quo que et Autoritates ad corollarium illud adductae corollarium istud probant: Si quis autem praesumpserit dicere, quod Deus dicitur omnia facere, non quia immediate per se, et proprie ista facit, sed tantum mediante Coelo, et quia fecit agentia, et patientia naturalia, vel conseruat, aut quia permittit, siue non impedit, seu contra impedimenta defendit, reprimetur faciliter per praemissa, sicut proximum huius praesumptionem similem reprimebat.

Notes

  1. 1

    Savile cites De mundo (On the World) as "11" here and again at 169E. The passages (the ancient saying, the chorus, the war-trumpet, the many names of Zeus) are from De mundo 6 in the modern numbering (397b–401a). Savile's number follows the chapter division of the medieval Latin text. The number is kept as Bradwardine gave it (Conventions §5.4).

    ↩
  2. 2

    The Latin says that God "works through himself, sustaining the labor of a laboring animal" (laborem sustinens). The Greek has a negation: God works "not bearing the toil of a laboring creature, but using a power that does not suffer." The Latin text as printed lacks the non. I translate the print as it stands, and Bradwardine's argument does not depend on the point. "Another translation" is the second of the two Latin versions of De mundo that Bradwardine quotes side by side.

    ↩
  3. 3

    cap. proximo means the chapter immediately before this one (the same sense as capitulum proximum in the first paragraph and proximum huius at the end). The preceding chapter is where Bradwardine reports Aristotle's identification of the single divine action with God's "speaking."

    ↩
  4. 4

    considerare seu intelligi secundum aliam translationem can be read in two ways. It may offer intelligi as the other translator's verb for considerare, as I have taken it. Or it may mean that the whole sentence is found in another translation. The Latin leaves this open and so does the English. A second alternative follows at once: potentissimo, seu optimo secundum aliam translationem.

    ↩
  5. 5

    The Vulgate of Wis 13:1 reads "they could not understand him who is" (eum qui est). Savile has quid est, which means "what is," or perhaps "what he is." I translate the print literally. The Latin may be a variant text of Wisdom, or a loose citation.

    ↩
  6. 6

    Arigikeminus is the Greek ἀρχικέραυνος, "ruler (or lord) of the thunderbolt," which the second translator renders Princeps fulminum. The Greek is De mundo 401a28–29, a line from the Orphic verses.

    ↩
  7. 7

    Savile's Autor de causis Commentator ipsius is ambiguous. I take it as two persons: the author of the Liber de causis and its commentator. It could also be read as "the author of On Causes, its Commentator," with Commentator a title for a single figure. Averroes, who is the usual "Commentator," has just been named.

    ↩
  8. 8

    The hymn of the three boys is the Song of the Three Children (Dan 3:57–88 in the Vulgate additions). Savile's right-hand margin at 170A has "36." as a variant for "26" (Isa 26:12 is the correct reference, so the main text stands), and, separately, the citation "Danielis 3." beside the hymn. The keyed text had these merged into a single variant (see Errata). No marker for Daniel 3 stands in the Latin text.

    ↩
  9. 9

    Savile's "homilia prima" and "homilia octava" are Augustine's Tractates on the Gospel of John, 1.13 and 8.1. In 8.1 he comments on the water turned into wine at Cana. The Trinit. citations a few lines later (On the Trinity 3, chs. 5 and 7) follow Savile's numbering of the chapters.

    ↩
  10. 10

    "The old translation" of De animalibus is Michael Scot's Latin version. Book 11 there corresponds to Parts of Animals I.5 (644b–645a), the exhortation to study even humble animals. Scot's Latin is obscure and I translate it as it stands.

    ↩
  11. 11

    The star in the text and the margin "* in Averroes. Iob." belong to two different things. "Job" is the source citation for the Job 10 quotation in the next sentence. "in Averroes" is the starred variant or parallel at complementum, apparently flagging that the phrase is found in Averroes. Savile's note does not say more, so the sense of the starred entry is uncertain. The main text is translated unchanged. The keyed text had both entries merged under a single marker as a variant.

    ↩
  12. 12

    secundo huius praemissum: "set forth earlier in the second [chapter] of this [work]." The Averroes passage is identified by book and comment number and referred back to chapter 2 of Book I.

    ↩
  13. 13

    The Vulgate has "Your hands made me and fashioned me whole round about" (fecerunt me, et plasmaverunt me totum in circuitu). Bradwardine's order is "fashioned me, and made me whole round about." He notes that it follows the punctuatio of Gregory the Great (Moralia 9.26), in which totum goes with fecerunt me, "made me whole." Gregory's reading is followed.

    ↩
  14. 14

    Savile's references "super Genesin ad literam 23" and "22," given in that order, are Augustine's De Genesi ad litteram 9. I take both passages to be in 9.15, the discussions of the formation of Eve and of the farmer as creator. The chapter numbers appear to follow an older division of the text.

    ↩
  15. 15

    Savile's text reads appetitudines and his margin gives appetitiones as a variant (‖). Both words mean "desires, inclinations," so the English cannot distinguish them. The main reading is translated.

    ↩
Errata: where the keyed text and the 1618 print differ (17)
SavileKeyed text (TCP)1618 print
169Areifactaerei factae
169AHVicHic (drop-capital H plus "Vic")
169Apotestin hocpotest in hoc
169Cchorae a (twice, also in 169B)choraea
169Cquis quequisque
169Dspeciocissimospeciocissimo [print misprint for speciosissimo; keyed text agrees]
170Bmitamurmiramur
170BObruitutObruitur
170Dconsiderateconsiderare
170Ene que; quantumcun queneque; quantumcunque
170A170A·2 (variant) "36. Danielis. 3."two entries: variant "36"; source "Danielis. 3." (keyed as a single variant)
170E170E·1 (variant) "in Auerroes. Iob."two entries: starred variant "in Auerroes"; source "Iob."
171Aquis quequisque
171Baffirmateaffirmare
171Bconformationem queconformationemque
171Dilludidemillud idem
171Equo quequoque